Hilo Customer Support - Design Document
Purpose: Problem in, action out - with context as the connective tissue.
Section 1: System Overview
What CS does - problem in, action out
A problem comes in. CS reasons over device, user, and policy context, and emits a single action - either internal (operational) or external (customer-facing).
Problem · input
CS · decision
Context · information
Action · output
Section 2: Actual Components
The same picture, with real systems - Intercom + Shopify + NetSuite + Hilo telemetry
Customer reaches Intercom. The Canvas Kit panel inside Intercom pulls device data (Hilo telemetry), commercial data (Shopify), and fulfilment data (NetSuite) - plus policy from the KB - and the agent picks one internal or external action.
Intercom Inbox · input
Intercom + Canvas Kit · CS hub
Telemetry · Shopify · NetSuite · KB · context
Action systems · output
Section 3: Current State - Request Path
Freshdesk + manual lookups - what happens today, end-to-end, when a customer writes in. Identity threads through email only; context is gathered tab-by-tab. The diagram shows the round-trip for a typical "my cuff isn't syncing" ticket that becomes an RMA + refund.
Why this hurts:
- 5+ systems, no shared identity. Agent re-keys email/serial across Freshdesk, Shopify, NetSuite, the Hilo admin, and the KB. Nothing auto-links.
- Context lives in the agent's head. Device telemetry, order, warranty, prior RMAs - all pulled by hand, every time.
- Customer is the bottleneck. Many tickets stall waiting on the customer to find the serial number on the back of the device.
- Copy-paste is the integration layer. RMA #, addresses, refund amounts - all manually pasted between NetSuite, Shopify, and Freshdesk replies.
- Multi-day wall-clock for a "simple" case. 5–15 min of agent time per touch, plus return shipping, then a separate touch to refund or ship a replacement.